£22.1m down the drain: Spurs were bled dry by useless flop who cost £3.6m per goal – opinion

A complete “fraud” bled the Lilywhites dry…

Tottenham Hotspur recently extended their unbeaten streak with a valiant victory at Luton Town, making them a team that seems invincible at the moment. Ange Postecoglou has made his team untouchable in the Premier League, and the fact that they defeated Manchester United and Liverpool while still earning a respectable away draw at Arsenal should serve as additional evidence.

Although the football is thrilling and the mentality has entirely changed for the better, it is likely his moves that have impressed the most, as some of his major additions have already developed into crucial players in north London.

James Maddison doesn’t require an introduction after his successful start in N17, where his offensive zeal and creative drive have made him one of the division’s most valuable assets. Micky van de Ven, who scored the game-winning goal on Saturday, is another player who appears to be on the rise, adding a goal to the remarkably strong foundation he has helped lay.

The sky is the limit for the Lilywhites’ growth under the former Celtic man if they continue to operate with such market aplomb in the upcoming windows.

Daniel Levy appears to have learned from his previous high-profile mistakes and is now determined to make sure he doesn’t repeat them by moving decisively when a target is discovered.

However, that hasn’t always been how they’ve conducted business.

Who is Spurs’ worst-ever signing?

It’s difficult to pinpoint Spurs’ worst signing, but not for want of alternatives, regrettably.

It is quite possible that if this question were posed to a group of admirers, they would all respond differently to the interviewer. One may yell, “Tanguy Ndombele for £63m.” Another one would be, “Richarlison cost £60m and has only scored two Premier League goals.”

The likes of Roberto Soldado, Erik Lamela, Paulinho, and David Bentley would once more be entirely feasible possibilities when going even further back.

Though he would not win the prize, Vincent Janssen would undoubtedly be a strong contender considering his disastrous three-year time in north London when it comes to profligacy measured in terms of dollars spent.

The 29-year-old was brought in from the Netherlands after having a tremendously successful time playing for AZ Alkmaar. He was signed to provide some strong competition for Harry Kane, who had made his mark with a string of excellent goal-scoring campaigns but had not yet demonstrated enough to suggest that it would be even close to the long-lasting success eventually earned.

As a result, the Dutchman was invited, making Mauricio Pochettino happy with his purchase. The current Chelsea manager would observe that: “Vincent is still very young and his potential is massive to develop,” remarked Mauricio of the 22-year-old. “His profile is ideal for us,” I said. He is a striker who enjoys fighting and working for the club, and he is skilled in the box. That suits us just right.

That final point would be particularly stressed by the Argentine, who would reiterate: “His human profile is ideal for the team; we always worry about that. He is a player who, in general, fits the team.

His assertions turned out to be utterly false, and the 6-foot-tall failure was fired after making just six goals in 42 appearances. His career with Spurs could not be revived, not even by a loan in Turkey, and he eventually left for Mexico.

In spite of a successful start to his brief stay with Fenerbahce, the 29-year-old was nonetheless criticized by Turkish football analyst and writer Hincal Uluc, who charged him with cheating: “Whoever brought Janssen to Turkey better take a long look in the mirror. We already have enough scammers in the league; we don’t need to add another one from abroad.

He hurled himself to the ground in order to receive a penalty. Janssen is here to get opposition players booked for diving rather than to play football.

Since that time, Janssen hasn’t really been able to match his incredible 32-goal Eredivisie season, which inspired Levy to make a significant investment in him.

How much did Spurs pay for Vincent Janssen?

When he arrived in July 2016, just as the Lilywhites were about to make the most unexpected of championship challenges before Leicester City triumphed, it was anticipated that his arrival would contribute some important goals to a team that already possessed a wealth of talent while also maybe assisting Kane in reaching even greater heights.

But it is fair to conclude that he fell short in both of these endeavors, and his £18.6 million price tag was hardly justified.

In actuality, that first season only produced a pitiful two goals in the league, neither of which were particularly important.

How much did Vincent Janssen earn at Spurs?

Given his youth and lack of elite level expertise, the agreement was made even sweeter by the relatively modest salaries he received for joining.

His career was undoubtedly affected by his inability to adapt to English football, turning what should have been a fantastic deal into a financially rewarding nightmare. Even his £34k weekly compensation turned sour because he amassed an additional £3.5m over the course of the two years that he actually received a salary from the team.

Janssen thereby cost Levy a total of £22.1 million. His true cost to Levy was a staggering £3.6m per goal when his meager goal total is compared to this amount.

How much did other Spurs players earn?

Even though his pay at the time was relatively insignificant compared to the rest of the team, such a deal should have made him one of their best additions. Even though Kieran Trippier made £35k per week as a much more reliable full-back, his £34k weekly wage was fairly comparable to that amount.

He made only £21k a week less than Dele Alli and Mousa Dembele, two of Pochettino’s most prized possessions, in terms of salary.

Harry Kane and Hugo Lloris, who both made a respectable £100k a week, were at the top of the pay scales for the 2016–17 season. The largest heist of that particular group was probably Lamela’s £80k-per-week wage, though Janssen’s anonymous contribution would suggest otherwise.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button